Peer Review Process
The Peer Review Process at the Journal of Finance and Banking is conducted through a double-blind review, meaning the identities of authors and reviewers are hidden from each other to maintain objectivity. The steps are as follows:
-
Manuscript Submission
Authors submit their manuscript via the OJS system, complete with curriculum vitae and copyright transfer form. -
Administrative and Plagiarism Check
The editorial office checks the completeness of documents, manuscript format, and verifies originality using anti-plagiarism software. -
Reviewer Assignment
Manuscripts that pass the initial check are sent to 2-3 reviewers who are experts in the relevant field. Reviewers are selected based on their competence and research experience related to the manuscript topic. -
Reviewer Evaluation
Reviewers assess the manuscript based on:-
Title, abstract, and keywords
-
Introduction and research objectives
-
Research methods
-
Results and analysis
-
Discussion and scientific contribution
-
Conclusion and recommendations
-
References
Reviewers provide recommendations: accept without revision, accept with minor revision, accept with major revision, or reject.
-
-
Editorial Decision
Editors review the reviewers’ comments, make the final decision, and notify the author. -
Manuscript Revision
If revisions are required, authors revise the manuscript according to reviewers’ suggestions and resubmit it to the editorial office. -
Final Verification
The editorial office checks the revised manuscript to ensure all corrections have been made and confirms it is ready for publication. -
Publication
Manuscripts that pass peer review are published in the journal, both in print and electronic formats.